I am starting with this quote of Ambedkar’s opinion of Islam, secular folks keep throwing the Ambedkar arguments whenever secularism topic comes up.This should shut them up. This would make an interesting reading for them.
Ambedkars quote on Islam
“Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. The second defect of Islam is that it is a system of social self-government and is incompatible with local self-government, because the allegiance of a Muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. To the Muslim ibi bene ibi patria [Where it is well with me, there is my country] is unthinkable. Wherever there is the rule of Islam, there is his own country. In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin.”
When it comes to secularism in India even BJP is living in a neverland of dreams. Lessons will be never learnt that india’s genesis was on two nation theory and on the basis of hatred against Hindus, Pakistan was formed. The Nehruvian tradition of capitalistic socialism generously topped with left and extreme left ideology continued this illusion that Hindus and Muslims are brothers and all will be “aman” and shanthi. How simply is ridiculous to reduce everything to an emotional level of existence is an art all these people have mastered.
I am in no way advocating that Muslims should be shunned. That is not what majority Hindus want nor any civilized nation can do that. This ambiguity of sabka sath as for as the social structure is considered is a myth. India is a Hindu majority country and their concerns should be addressed head on. Time has come for India to reclaim the Hindutva tradition openly and with out shying.
Was there any amalgamation of Hindu and Muslim society in India in the last 70 years? It was a fragile fabric of understanding that keeps both communities together. Time again we have seen tears in the same. The left, congress and the communal casteiest parties like BSP, Samajwadi Party, the various factions of Jananta Dals and other regional parties feed into this illusionary comradery between Hindus and Muslims and made the Muslims into a comfortable and reliable vote bank for themselves.
Narendra Modis sabka sathh sath vikas is good only for the economic development of the country. That slogan will never unite Hindus and Muslims. The ghettoization of Muslims is consistent throughout India. It started with aprtion of india and still continues irespective who has ruled the federal states or the union center. The simmering difference between the communities left over after the traumatic partition of India is eternally kept alive by the above said parties. Secularism has played a major part in this and it is constantly evoked by all as if a basis for india’s existence as a nation.
Indian Muslims who decided to stay back were slowly converted into a community of ever unhappy sea of humanity that perennially needed to be assuaged with the secular balm. The onus of that was thrust upon the majority hindus. Did that ever mainstreamed them into joining the notion of India? NO.
Most opinion makers in Muslim community openly encourage the members to reject their cultural identity as a people of India. Saying bharat mata or singing vande mataram or even often singing the national anthem is discouraged as haram and un-islamic. Now their leaders openly advocate Muslims first loyalty is to Islam and not to the country or the constitution. Ambedkar clearly said” that the allegiance of a Muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith.”Time and again Muslims have proved that amply. There are no moderate Muslims any where in the world. Islam doesn’t allow moderation. It is an extreme ideology that dismisses any other thought process as untenable before Allah. And what is then the secular refrain these Muslim leaders keep throwing at the majority Hindu community.
Take this waris Pathan incident. This man is a rabid Hindu hater and spews venom and vitriol when ever he talks, just like his master Assaudin Owaissi. Yet this man goes to a Ganapathi pandal and extoll people to say Ganpati bappa moriya. He was openly trying to fool people and is a usual vote bank trick. And in a matter of time was made to retract that and publicly apologize.Rahul Ghandhi and the others who keep berating the “communal Modi” keep changing their topi and tilak day in and out with out shame and that is the height of Indian Secularisim.
Go back to Narendra Modis refusal to wear the Islamic skull cap. See the difference, the man refused to wear it as he never believed in that symbolic gesture as he knew it lacked substance and truth. What are this empty secularism Indian leaders are taking about. Does it exist in the constitution only to be used as a tool? does the s words “vasudheiva kutumbakam “ring hollow?
And how about this,another hoax on hindus thrust by MKG
- रघुपति राघव राजाराम,
- पतित पावन सीताराम
- सीताराम सीताराम,
- भज प्यारे तू सीताराम
- ईश्वर अल्लाह तेरो नाम,
- सब को सन्मति दे भगवान
- राम रहीम करीम समान
- हम सब है उनकी संतान
- सब मिला मांगे यह वरदान
- हमारा रहे मानव का ज्ञान
- raghupati rāghav rājārām,
- patit pāvan sītārām
- sītārām, jai sītārām,
- bhaj pyāre tu sītārām
- ishwar allah tero naam
- sab ko sanmati de bhagavān
- rāma rahīm karīm samān
- hama saba hai unaki santān
- saba mila māṅge yaha varadān
- hamara rahe mānava kā jñān
To top it Mohan Bhagwat was talking about SRI Ram as Imanm – E -Hind? What was going in his mind?